occupational noise exposure and age correction: the problem of selection bias
Clicks: 136
ID: 219755
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
135 views
10 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Selection bias often invalidates conclusions about populations based on clinical convenience samples. A recent paper in this journal [1] makes two surprising assertions about noise-induced permanent threshold shift (NIPTS): first, that there is more NIPTS at 2 kHz than at higher frequencies; second, that NIPTS declines with advancing age. Neither assertion can be supported with the data presented, which were obtained from a clinical sample; both are consistent with the hypothesis that people who choose to attend an audiology clinic have worse hearing, especially at 2 kHz, than people of the same age and gender who choose not to attend.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (97 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
dobie2009internationaloccupational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Robert A. Dobie |
| Journal | archives of biochemistry and biophysics |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.3390/ijerph6123023
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.