kebebasan pers dalam konteks kuhp pidana: menyoal undang-undang sebagai fungsi komunikasi
Clicks: 77
ID: 219219
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
22.8
/100
77 views
15 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #44 of 65 articles by views in iranian journal of pharmaceutical research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In his book, The Limits of Law, Anthony Allots stated that regulation is no more that a communication system based on Wittgenstein’s phrase: the language game. Regulations always ask the same questions: who’s the actor of communication? For whom the regulations been imposed? How did its communication method? What were communication obstacles which disturbed the communication process? Speaking about press regulations, which cutting-off and narrowing the freedom of press in Indonesia as imposed by KUH Pidana, it was clear enough that such regulation’s function mainly part of repressive acts, not preventive purposes.
| Reference Key |
rahayu2007mediatorkebebasan
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu |
| Journal | iranian journal of pharmaceutical research |
| Year | 2007 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.