Long-latency afferent inhibition during selective finger movement.
Clicks: 198
ID: 21891
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
72.5
/100
198 views
164 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #20 of 22 articles by views in journal of neurophysiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Stimulation of a peripheral nerve of a hand at rest modulates excitability in the motor cortex and, in particular, leads to inhibition when applied at an interval of approximately 200 ms (long-latency afferent inhibition; LAI). Surround inhibition (SI) is the process that inhibits neighboring muscles not involved in a particular task. The neuronal mechanisms of SI are not known, and it is possible that LAI might contribute to it. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with and without movement of the index finger, the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured of two functionally distinct target muscles of the hand (abductor digiti minimi muscle = ADM, 1st dorsal interosseus muscle = FDI). Electrical stimulation was applied 180 ms before TMS to either the fifth finger or the index finger. Both homotopic and heterotopic finger stimulation resulted in LAI without movement. With index finger movement, motor output further decreased with homo- and heterotopic stimulation in the ADM. In the moving FDI, however, there was no change with either homo- or heterotopic stimulation. Additionally, in the unstimulated movement trials, LAI increased with the amount of unintentional co-activation that occurred despite attempts to maintain the ADM at rest. However, with finger stimulation added, there were almost no increased MEPs despite co-activation. These findings suggest that LAI increases during movement and can enhance SI.
| Reference Key |
voller2005longlatencyjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Voller, Bernhard;St Clair Gibson, Alan;Lomarev, Mikhail;Kanchana, Sulada;Dambrosia, James;Dang, Nguyet;Hallett, Mark; |
| Journal | journal of neurophysiology |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | URL not found |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.