critical analysis of the (eco)absolutist interpretation of precautionary principle: a review in the light of the decision making procedure

Clicks: 52
ID: 218391
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 5 articles by views in journal of orthomolecular medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This  article  arose  from  the  concern  about  the  (eco)absolutist  interpretation  of  the precautionary principle. Therefore, it sought to deconstruct, critically, through the dialectical method, that principle in the light of the administrative decision making procedure, to ensure that all values (not just environmental ones) are duly considered in the establishment of regulation of any activity potentially harmful to the environment, obtaining then the synthesis of a legally consistent definition of the precautionary principle
Reference Key
tebar2015revistacritical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Wellington Boigues Corbalan Tebar
Journal journal of orthomolecular medicine
Year 2015
DOI
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9628/2015.v1i1.159
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.