die teologies-polemiese gerigtheid van genesis 1-3: implikasies vir die gereformeerde leer oor die erfsonde
Clicks: 127
ID: 218102
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
127 views
13 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #109 of 214 articles by views in BMC emergency medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 214 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The theological polemic purpose of Genesis 1-3: implications for the reformed doctrine on original sin
This article focuses on the polemic nature of Genesis 1-3 and the implications thereof on the reformed doctrine regarding original sin. In the first place the views of the creation narratives as historical-literal and mythological material are discussed. Thereafter the article proposes that the creation narratives must be treated as theological material with a polemic and prophetic purpose. The implications of this for the reformed doctrine on original sin are subsequently discussed.
| Reference Key |
vorster2009indie
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;N. Vorster |
| Journal | BMC emergency medicine |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.4102/ids.v43i1.216
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.