interpretation of contract, interpretation of the law and qualification: overcoming barriers
Clicks: 102
ID: 218032
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
102 views
23 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #38 of 43 articles by views in epilepsy & behavior : e&b
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The paper sustains the need to overcome the rigid separation between interpretation of the law, interpretation of contract and qualification of contracts, rooted in the dichotomy between public and private law and the dogma of subsumption. Its argument is based on the transformation of the role of private autonomy in land, the functionality of institutions and the circularity of the hermeneutic process.
| Reference Key |
konder2015scientiainterpretation
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Carlos Nelson de Paula Konder |
| Journal | epilepsy & behavior : e&b |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.5433/2178-8189.2015v19n1p47
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.