global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016
Clicks: 5
ID: 217849
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
1.2
/100
5 views
4 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #42 of 42 articles by views in usak university journal of engineering sciences
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Climate, land use, and other anthropogenic and natural
drivers have the potential to influence fire dynamics in many regions. To
develop a mechanistic understanding of the changing role of these drivers
and their impact on atmospheric composition, long-term fire records are
needed that fuse information from different satellite and in situ data
streams. Here we describe the fourth version of the Global Fire Emissions
Database (GFED) and quantify global fire emissions patterns during
1997–2016. The modeling system, based on the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach
(CASA) biogeochemical model, has several modifications from the previous
version and uses higher quality input datasets. Significant upgrades
include (1) new burned area estimates with contributions from small fires,
(2) a revised fuel consumption parameterization optimized using field
observations, (3) modifications that improve the representation of fuel
consumption in frequently burning landscapes, and (4) fire severity estimates
that better represent continental differences in burning processes across
boreal regions of North America and Eurasia. The new version has a higher
spatial resolution (0.25°) and uses a different set of emission
factors that separately resolves trace gas and aerosol emissions from
temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Global mean carbon emissions using
the burned area dataset with small fires (GFED4s) were 2.2 × 1015 grams of carbon per year (Pg C yr−1) during 1997–2016, with a
maximum in 1997 (3.0 Pg C yr−1) and minimum in 2013 (1.8 Pg C yr−1). These estimates were 11 % higher than our previous estimates
(GFED3) during 1997–2011, when the two datasets overlapped. This net
increase was the result of a substantial increase in burned area (37 %),
mostly due to the inclusion of small fires, and a modest decrease in mean
fuel consumption (−19 %) to better match estimates from field studies,
primarily in savannas and grasslands. For trace gas and aerosol emissions,
differences between GFED4s and GFED3 were often larger due to the use of
revised emission factors. If small fire burned area was excluded (GFED4
without the
sfor small fires), average emissions were 1.5 Pg C yr−1. The addition of small fires had the largest impact on emissions in temperate North America, Central America, Europe, and temperate Asia. This small fire layer carries substantial uncertainties; improving these estimates will require use of new burned area products derived from high-resolution satellite imagery. Our revised dataset provides an internally consistent set of burned area and emissions that may contribute to a better understanding of multi-decadal changes in fire dynamics and their impact on the Earth system. GFED data are available from http://www.globalfiredata.org.
| Reference Key |
werf2017earthglobal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;G. R. van der Werf;J. T. Randerson;L. Giglio;T. T. van Leeuwen;T. T. van Leeuwen;Y. Chen;B. M. Rogers;M. Mu;M. J. E. van Marle;M. J. E. van Marle;D. C. Morton;G. J. Collatz;R. J. Yokelson;P. S. Kasibhatla |
| Journal | usak university journal of engineering sciences |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.5194/essd-9-697-2017
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.