a comparison between concept of tendency to gloss ibn arabi and meybodi mystical interpretations, a comparative study
Clicks: 237
ID: 217664
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
237 views
42 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #24 of 55 articles by views in pharmacological research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Muslim commentators on the basis of commitment to the appearances of various verses and hadith or conservative approach in interpreting the Word of God, in the mystical interpretation and gloss of verses, adopted a different stance. Manuscript, austerity and similarities, in some verses of the Quran is represents the suitable role of gloss in comprehend Inward verses. Among the interpretations of Qur'anic mystical interpretations centered, is gloss. This paper refers to the lexical meaning Transformation on gloss, the gloss of the concept in his Kashf al-Asrar Meybodi,Ibn Arabi’s Tafsire-Quran karimlkarim, and among these, because they disagreed with the gloss of the Quran full of idealism and takes the following gloss. Two commentators have offered their interpretations of the gloss, it is similar, although the gloss of Ibn Arabic Audacity seen, the gloss of the opinion that religion is Meybodi Ashari (Ahle Hadith), and there is no need to mention Arabic in the impetuosity of his much younger than his other works, especially Fosus Al Hekam. Mfsrnsbt opposed to the gloss of both revelations about the human intellect is the origin of which is described gloss. Thus, both philosophical and interpretive speakers opposed it as the true interpretation of their gloss and the gloss of the mystical Sufis are considered. Such a definition can be interpreted from two different interpretation of it is defined today. The modern definition of interpretation is rich in both gloss.
| Reference Key |
q2012comparativea
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Khayatian, Q;Salmani, Y |
| Journal | pharmacological research |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.