el problema del otro y la Ética. la antropologÍa, los derechos humanos y la polÍtica
Clicks: 226
ID: 217368
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
226 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #14 of 39 articles by views in ANZ journal of surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
La cuestión a dilucidar es la ética que debe prevalecer en el desempeño antropológico, un tema que si bien tiene fuentes filosóficas subyace en la antropología de la manera en que ésta se acerca al problema de estudio. El texto que se presenta intenta ubicar una posible relación entre la ética, la antropología, los derechos humanos, y la política, frente al «problema del otro», con el fin de acercarlo al contexto mexicano desde los postulados de Enrique Dussel en su Introducción a una Filosofía Latinoamericana de la Liberación. ¿Qué relación existe entre ética y antropología? ¿Cuál debe ser la conducta ética del antropólogo? ¿Es posible una ética o debemos considerar muchas éticas dada la diversidad cultural? ¿Los derechos humanos son —como propuesta de valores— universales o esto es un imposible? ¿Existe una ética para la política frente a la diversidad?
ABSTRACT
This text explores the question of the ethics that should prevail in anthropological pursuits, a topic which, despite philosophical undertones, is an underlining issue in anthropology, particularly in the way in which it approaches the study problem. The article attempts to identify a possible relationship between ethics, anthropology, human rights and politics, in light of «the problem of the other,» with the purpose of positioning it within the Mexican context, based on the postulates of Enrique Dussel in his Introducción a una Filosofía Latinoamericana de la Liberación. What relation exists between ethics and anthropology? What should be considered ethical behavior of an anthropologist? Is just one ethic possible or must we consider several, given cultural diversity? Are human rights—as a proposal of values—universal, or is that impossible? Do ethics exist for politics, given this diversity?
| Reference Key |
chamberlin2008revistael
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Michael W. Chamberlin |
| Journal | ANZ journal of surgery |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
10.22201/cimsur.18704115e.2008.5.209
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.