john damascene or jerusalem monk john
Clicks: 20
ID: 216561
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
2.7
/100
9 views
5 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Most of original manuscripts wrongly claim authority of the treatise Adversus
Constantinum Caballinum to John of Damascus. We applied the method of
detailed linguistic analysis in order to check the hypothesis that Jerusalem
monk John, the representative of three eastern patriarchs on the Second
Council of Nicaea, wrote this iconophile work. Stylistic resemblance between
the speech that John of Jerusalem held on the Second Council of Nicaea and
sermon Adversus Constantinum Caballinum could indicate the same person as
author.
| Reference Key |
jovana2014zbornikjohn
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Pavlović Jovana |
| Journal | mires and peat |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.2298/ZRVI1451007P
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.