origen y desarrollo de la ciencia política: temas y problemas
Clicks: 151
ID: 215465
1999
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
151 views
15 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #18 of 40 articles by views in meditsinskaya radiologiya
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
El presente artículo profundiza en tres grandes temas de interés que, además de
encontrarse claramente entrelazados en la historia de la disciplina, ilustran algunos de los
principales desacuerdos que se han generado por los cambios en los cánones. Esto con el fin de
pensar la política en las distintas épocas (lo que desde la perspectiva khuniana podría ser
considerado como una revolución científica).
| Reference Key |
gamboa1999convergenciaorigen
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Héctor Zamitiz Gamboa |
| Journal | meditsinskaya radiologiya |
| Year | 1999 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.