iš lietuvių ir latvių tarmėtyros istorijos: leksikos klausimai eduardo volterio programose

Clicks: 114
ID: 215415
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #49 of 195 articles by views in current pharmaceutical biotechnology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

FROM THE HISTORY OF LITHUANIAN AND LATVIAN DIALECTOLOGY STUDIES: ISSUES OF LEXIS IN EDUARD VOLTER’S PROGRAMMES

Summary

Geolinguistic research into the lexis of the Lithuanian and Latvian languages should be linked to the first questionnaires of the latter half of the nineteenth century when a comprehensive gathering of folklore, ethnographical and language facts started in the north-western part of the Russian Empire – the present-day Lithuania and Latvia.

The article focuses on the first Lithuanian and Latvian programmes drawn up on the initiative of Eduard Volter – „Программа для указания особенностей говоров Литвы и Жмуди” (Санкт Петербург, 1886) that is considered the first questionnaire of Lithua­nian dialectal studies and „Programma tautas gara mantu krājējiem“ (Jelgava, 1892) that dealt with the Latvian cultural heritage (ethnography, ethnology, mythology, etc.). Al­though the programmes are of a different nature, some of the questions are common for both of them. Three common semantic question groups should be distinguished: 1) the names of the nations under research – the Lithuanian (and Žemaitian) as well as the Latvian – and the neighbouring nations (the Belarusians, Russians, Latvians, Lithua­nians, and the Kurshes); 2) the names of living quarters (kaimas, kiemas, ulyčia) and of houses and homesteads; 3) issues connected with mythology.

The first Lithuanian and Latvian programmes already revealed common semantic lexical groups. A detailed analysis of these programmes creates conditions for further search for parallels in the studies of Lithuanian and Latvian.

Reference Key
mikulnien2011baltisticai Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Danguolė Mikulėnienė;Anna Stafecka
Journal current pharmaceutical biotechnology
Year 2011
DOI
10.15388/baltistica.46.1.1497
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.