iš lietuvių ir latvių tarmėtyros istorijos: leksikos klausimai eduardo volterio programose
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #48 of 195 articles by views in current pharmaceutical biotechnology
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
FROM THE HISTORY OF LITHUANIAN AND LATVIAN DIALECTOLOGY STUDIES: ISSUES OF LEXIS IN EDUARD VOLTER’S PROGRAMMES
Summary
Geolinguistic research into the lexis of the Lithuanian and Latvian languages should be linked to the first questionnaires of the latter half of the nineteenth century when a comprehensive gathering of folklore, ethnographical and language facts started in the north-western part of the Russian Empire – the present-day Lithuania and Latvia.
The article focuses on the first Lithuanian and Latvian programmes drawn up on the initiative of Eduard Volter – „Программа для указания особенностей говоров Литвы и Жмуди” (Санкт Петербург, 1886) that is considered the first questionnaire of Lithuanian dialectal studies and „Programma tautas gara mantu krājējiem“ (Jelgava, 1892) that dealt with the Latvian cultural heritage (ethnography, ethnology, mythology, etc.). Although the programmes are of a different nature, some of the questions are common for both of them. Three common semantic question groups should be distinguished: 1) the names of the nations under research – the Lithuanian (and Žemaitian) as well as the Latvian – and the neighbouring nations (the Belarusians, Russians, Latvians, Lithuanians, and the Kurshes); 2) the names of living quarters (kaimas, kiemas, ulyčia) and of houses and homesteads; 3) issues connected with mythology.
The first Lithuanian and Latvian programmes already revealed common semantic lexical groups. A detailed analysis of these programmes creates conditions for further search for parallels in the studies of Lithuanian and Latvian.
| Reference Key |
mikulnien2011baltisticai
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Journal | current pharmaceutical biotechnology |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
10.15388/baltistica.46.1.1497
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
ZincirX productsfrom the team behind Journament
-
PatentYazar
Patent drafts for the EPO, USPTO and TürkPatent
From inventor notes to a DOCX draft: description, claims, abstract. The machine drafts, the attorney signs.
See how it works (opens in a new tab) -
Projenator
Have a project idea? Score and plan it with AI
AI scores your idea in five dimensions and builds a phased plan. Your first project is free, no card needed.
Start your first project (opens in a new tab)
Cookies
We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site and keep you signed in. With your permission we would also use Google Analytics to see how the site is used, and Google AdSense to show ads on journal and article pages. Both stay off unless you accept, and you can change your mind at any time. How we use cookies · KVKK notice (Türkiye)
Cookie settings
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.