chi legge ... ragiona meglio? abitudini di lettura e funzioni di ragionamento

Clicks: 21
ID: 214863
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #36 of 46 articles by views in chemical engineering communications

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Studies in the literature have amply demonstrated how reading fiction influences and operates in many cognitive levels, and can therefore act as a real gym for the mind. In this study we tried to investigate how a frequent reading habit can affect verbal, numerical and abstract reasoning skills. The results show that readers called "strong" have better performances in both verbal and numerical reasoning tests against readers defined as "weak". As well as a workout for verbal reasoning, derived directly from the activity of mentalizing which is a typical process of the narrative understanding, it would seem that reading also affects the working memory, a crucial function for numerical reasoning.
Reference Key
batini2016ricerchechi Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Federico Batini;Marco Bartolucci
Journal chemical engineering communications
Year 2016
DOI
10.6092/issn.1970-2221/6444
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.