prūsų kalbos linksniavimo sistema ir jos kitimas

Clicks: 121
ID: 214365
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #45 of 195 articles by views in current pharmaceutical biotechnology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract

THE DECLENSION OF OLD PRUSSIAN AND IT’S EVOLUTION

Summary

There are two dialects we can reconstruct in old Prussian, which differ territorially and chronologically. They also have different declension and stem-system.

We can reconstruct quite ancient paradigm with all Baltic stems and three gender forms in the dialect of Elbing vocabulary (look at the table in 1.).

The declension system of the dialect of Catechisms performed as the result of many phonetic changes (the widening of short vocals i, u, the narrowing of long vocal ē and especially the changing ā>ū after the labial and guttural consonants and the strong flexion shortening). That is why the mixing of the stems has started. The features of stem survived best in Nominative forms (2.1.). In other cases formed two types of declension: hard (with vocal a dominating in the flexion) and soft (with the vocals i (e) dominating in the flexion) (2.2.1.-2.2.4.).

Beside the opposition a || i raised a new one u || i (2.3.-2.3.4.).

The evolution of old Prussian declension system could be explained by the inherent laws of the language itself, not searching for the influence of other languages.

Reference Key
kaukien2011baltisticaprs Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Audronė Kaukienė
Journal current pharmaceutical biotechnology
Year 2011
DOI
10.15388/baltistica.30.2.321
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.