ocular dryness assessment in saudi employees working indoors and outdoors
Clicks: 307
ID: 214305
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
307 views
35 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #2 of 6 articles by views in oftalʹmologiâ
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Raied Fagehi,1 Hani Ghazal,2 Saad Alrabiah,2 Ali Abusharha,1 Saud Alanazi,1 Ali Alsaqr,1 Ali Masmali3 1Department of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Ophthalmology Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3Cornea Research Chair, Department of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Objective: To investigate dry eye disease in Saudi employees working in indoor and outdoor environments.Methods: A single-center randomized controlled study was carried out in an optometry clinic, to assess the ocular dryness of 24 male employees (12 indoor and 12 outdoor employees, mean age 36.4±2.5 years). The Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire was used to assess ocular dryness. Tear film assessment was carried out using phenol red thread (PRT), tear film osmolarity test, and fluorescein tears breakup time (FTBUT) with slit-lamp biomicroscopy.Results: Both indoor and outdoor employees showed mild-to-moderate ocular dryness. A significant difference (P=0.004) was found for the tear quality test (FTBUT) between the indoor (8.58±4.8) and outdoor (5.54±1.3) employees. However, no significant differences for the tear quantity tests (tear osmolarity and PRT) between the indoor and outdoor employees were observed.Conclusion: Dry eye cases were detected in both groups. This might be due to the hot dry environment in Riyadh and the use of air conditioners commonly used indoors. A significant difference was observed for the tear film stability, which might be due to the effect of environment and/or visual display unit use. Keywords: tear film, ocular dryness, tear osmolarity, environment
| Reference Key |
r2018clinicalocular
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Fagehi R;Ghazal H;Alrabiah S;Abusharha A;Alanazi S;Alsaqr A;Masmali A |
| Journal | oftalʹmologiâ |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.