identifying reasons for failure in biomedical research and publishing
Clicks: 224
ID: 211075
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
2.1
/100
7 views
7 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The regular assessment of Brazilian scientific output means that individual university departments need to constantly improve the quantity and quality of their scientific output. A significant proportion of this output involves the work of Master’s and Doctoral students, but getting this work published in a suitable journal can often prove to be a challenge. Although students’ lack of fluency in English is a contributing factor, many of the problems observed have an early origin in the formulation of the research problem and its relevance to current research trends in the international literature. In short, more time needs to be spent in the library and less in the laboratory, and more effort needs to be made in teaching students basic research skills such as the effective use of bibliographic databases like PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (137 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
bousfield2009brazilianidentifying
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;D. Bousfield |
| Journal | Free radical biology & medicine |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0100-879X2009000700001
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.