the palaeolithic, preservation and the public
Clicks: 245
ID: 209868
1999
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
245 views
52 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #80 of 116 articles by views in spectrochimica acta part a, molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The caves and open sites of the Palaeolithic lack the monumental remains that attract visitors to many later prehistoric and historic sites, and they tend to be more difficult to preserve and interpret successfully to the public. These issues are examined through a comparison of three very different sites, in China, Tanzania and Portugal, two of which have been accorded World Heritage status.
| Reference Key |
stanley-price1999archaeologythe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Nicholas Stanley-Price |
| Journal | spectrochimica acta part a, molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy |
| Year | 1999 |
| DOI |
10.5334/ai.3016
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.