hans jonas and his critics
Clicks: 7
ID: 209681
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
1.8
/100
7 views
4 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #21 of 21 articles by views in journal of loss prevention in the process industries
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper presents two more elaborate criticism of the Jonas´ project, namely that taken from the transcendental-pragmatic of K.O-Apel and taken from the philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. The two philosophers are confronted with the Jonas´ principle of responsibility, indicating its shortcomings and limitations. The purpose of the paper is a glimpse of the way that the principle of responsibility has to follow in order to better respond to the demands of ethical foundation of our time.
| Reference Key |
viana2014aufklrunghans
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Wellistony Carvalho Viana |
| Journal | journal of loss prevention in the process industries |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.18012/arf.2016.18235
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.