pengambilan keputusan untuk pemilihan supplier bahan baku dengan pendekatan analytic hierarchy processdi pr pahala sidoarjo

Clicks: 135
ID: 209667
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #13 of 21 articles by views in depik jurnal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Choosing right raw material supplier(s) is essential to reassure raw material of good quality. There are several approcahes being used for supplier selection, including method of selection and evaluation system, and models. This study aimed at evaluating and developing raw material supplier selection method in PR Pahala, Sidoarjo, Indonesia, a cigarrette company. The model used in this study was QCDFR (Quality, Cost, Delivery, Flexibility, Responsiveness) model. Several stages employed during development of the model were: establishing criterion, performance indicator of supplier of each criterion, alternative, criterion weight, performance indicator of supplier alternative and, making of spread sheet and reporting of evaluation election of supplier. There are several main suppliers of dried tobacco to be evaluated in this study, which come from four different areas, namely Madura, Bondowoso, Tulungagung, and Malang. The model developed should be able to assisst the company in the supplier selection to achieve supplier of the best performance.The most important criterion factor of supplier selection in PR Pahala is criterion of quality which had highest weight of 0,373, followed by cost of 0,266, criterion of responsivenessof 0,156, criterion of delivery of 0,128, criterion of flexibility of 0,077. Moreover, weight of selection alternative according to area were Madura with 0,311, Tulungagung 0,234, Bondowoso 0,253, Malang 0,202.
Reference Key
jannah2016agrointekpengambilan Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Miftakhul Jannah;Muhammad Fakhry;Rakhmawati Rakhmawati
Journal depik jurnal
Year 2016
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.