proses berpikir siswa berdasarkan kerangka kerja mason
Clicks: 16
ID: 209158
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
4.5
/100
16 views
6 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #265 of 274 articles by views in Bioresource technology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 274 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The determine of this study is explain the thinking process of high and low performing students in solving mathematical problems, so classified in qualitative research. The data collection is done by the provision of initial tests, giving the final test, and interviews with the study subjects after solving mathematical problems. The results showed that high-ability student fulfills the know, want, and introduce at the stage of entry. In the attack phase fulfills the try, maybe, and why. At this stage of the reviews meet the check and reflect aspects. Low-ability students meet aspects know and want the entry stage. In the attack phase fulfills the try and do a review on the stage of mathematical problem solving.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses berpikir siswa berkemampuan tinggi dan rendah dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika, sehingga tergolong dalam penelitian kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan pemberian tes awal, pemberian tes akhir, dan wawancara terhadap subjek penelitian setelah menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa berkemampuan tinggi memenuhi aspek know, want, dan introduce pada tahap entry. Pada tahap attack memenuhi aspek try, maybe, dan why. Pada tahap review memenuhi aspek check dan reflect. Siswa berkemampuan rendah memenuhi aspek know dan want pada tahap entry. Pada tahap attack memenuhi aspek try dan tidak melakukan tahapan review pada penyelesaian masalah matematika.
| Reference Key |
wardhani2016jurnalproses
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Wulan Anindya Wardhani;Subanji Subanji;Dwiyana Dwiyana |
| Journal | Bioresource technology |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.17977/jp.v1i3.6152
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.