efficiency of two ftai protocols in crossbred dairy cows during different seasons
Clicks: 281
ID: 208993
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
281 views
44 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #7 of 25 articles by views in 4th ccps global summit on process safety 2017
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
ABSTRACT. Silenciato L.N., Mello M.R.B., Andrade R.B., Daflon Júnior F.C., Rodrigues Neto J.B., Cavalcante M.C. & Palhano H.B. [Efficiency of two FTAI protocols in crossbred dairy cows during different seasons.] Eficiência de dois protocolos de IATF em vacas leiteiras mestiças em diferentes estações do ano. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária. 38(Supl.2):169-174, 2016. Departamento de Reprodução e Avaliação Animal, Instituto de Zootecnia. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rodovia BR 465, Km 7, Seropédica, RJ 23890-000, Brasil. E-mail: larasilenciato@hotmail.com This study evaluated the conception and pregnancy rates of crossbred dairy cows submitted to two FTAI protocols in different seasons. Ninety-five multiparous cows were randomly allocated into two treatments: Group I - GnRH + intravaginal P4 device at D0; prostaglandin and withdrawing the device at D8; GnRH + FTAI at D10. For Group II, the protocol employed was similar to GI but without P4 device. The groups were evaluated during rainy (October to April) and dry season (May to September). Conception (CR) and pregnancy rates (PR) in Groups I and II during the rainy season were, respectively, 40% and 68% (Group I) and 8% and 16% (group II) with a significant difference (p <0.05) between groups. The values of CR and PR for groups I and II, in the dry season, were 28% and 44% (Group I) and 10% and 20% (Group II), respectively, without significant difference (p> 0.05). When conception and pregnancy rates were compared between the rainy and dry season within each group, there was no statistical difference. It is concluded that the season did not affect the FTAI efficiency and that the inclusion of progesterone in the protocol improved conception and pregnancy rates during the rainy season.
| Reference Key |
silenciato2016brazilianefficiency
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Lara Nogueira Silenciato;Marco Roberto Bourg de Mello;Rodrigo Botelho Andrade;Flávio Castro Daflon Júnior;João Bosco Rodrigues Neto;Miria Costa Cavalcante;Helcimar Barbosa Palhano |
| Journal | 4th ccps global summit on process safety 2017 |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.