a methodology for investigating dust model performance using synergistic earlinet/aeronet dust concentration retrievals
Clicks: 91
ID: 208367
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
27.0
/100
91 views
24 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #156 of 183 articles by views in bioorganic & medicinal chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 183 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Systematic measurements of dust concentration profiles at a continental scale
were recently made possible by the development of synergistic retrieval
algorithms using combined lidar and sun photometer data and the establishment
of robust remote-sensing networks in the framework of Aerosols, Clouds, and
Trace gases Research InfraStructure Network (ACTRIS)/European Aerosol
Research Lidar Network (EARLINET). We present a methodology for using these
capabilities as a tool for examining the performance of dust transport
models. The methodology includes considerations for the selection of
a suitable data set and appropriate metrics for the exploration of the
results. The approach is demonstrated for four regional dust transport models
(BSC-DREAM8b v2, NMMB/BSC-DUST, DREAMABOL, DREAM8-NMME-MACC) using dust
observations performed at 10 ACTRIS/EARLINET stations. The observations,
which include coincident multi-wavelength lidar and sun photometer
measurements, were processed with the Lidar-Radiometer Inversion Code (LIRIC)
to retrieve aerosol concentration profiles. The methodology proposed here
shows advantages when compared to traditional evaluation techniques that
utilize separately the available measurements such as separating the
contribution of dust from other aerosol types on the lidar profiles and
avoiding model assumptions related to the conversion of concentration fields
to aerosol extinction values. When compared to LIRIC retrievals, the
simulated dust vertical structures were found to be in good agreement for all
models with correlation values between 0.5 and 0.7 in the 1–6 km
range, where most dust is typically observed. The absolute dust
concentration was typically underestimated with mean bias values of -40 to
-20 μg m−3 at 2 km, the altitude of maximum mean
concentration. The reported differences among the models found in this
comparison indicate the benefit of the systematic use of the proposed
approach in future dust model evaluation studies.
| Reference Key |
binietoglou2015atmospherica
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;I. Binietoglou;S. Basart;L. Alados-Arboledas;V. Amiridis;A. Argyrouli;H. Baars;J. M. Baldasano;D. Balis;L. Belegante;J. A. Bravo-Aranda;P. Burlizzi;V. Carrasco;A. Chaikovsky;A. Comerón;G. D'Amico;M. Filioglou;M. J. Granados-Muñoz;J. L. Guerrero-Rascado;L. Ilic;P. Kokkalis;A. Maurizi;L. Mona;F. Monti;C. Muñoz-Porcar;D. Nicolae;A. Papayannis;G. Pappalardo;G. Pejanovic;S. N. Pereira;M. R. Perrone;A. Pietruczuk;M. Posyniak;F. Rocadenbosch;A. Rodríguez-Gómez;M. Sicard;N. Siomos;A. Szkop;E. Terradellas;A. Tsekeri;A. Vukovic;U. Wandinger;J. Wagner |
| Journal | bioorganic & medicinal chemistry |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.5194/amt-8-3577-2015
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.