aplicação do herbicida diclofop na cultura da soja para controle de papuã, brachiaria plantaginea (linck) hitch application of the herbicide diclofop in soybean for control of brachiaria plantaginea (linck) hitch
Clicks: 170
ID: 208315
1979
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
170 views
19 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #84 of 96 articles by views in anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Durante o ano agrícola de 1977/78 foi conduzida uma pesquisa a campo na região da Depressão Central do Rio Grande do Sul, com o objetivo de estabelecer a dose e a época de aplicação do herbicida diclofop que proporcionassem controle mais eficiente do Papua e que oferecessem maior seletividade à cultura. Os tratamentos constaram de combinações das doses de 720, 1080 e 1440 g/ha de diclofop, e aplicações em pré-plantio incorporadas a o solo (PPI), pré-emergência (PRE), pós-emergência quando as plântulas de papuã se apresentavam com duas folhas (POS-2) e outra na ocasião em que se encontravam no estádio de quatro folhas (POS-4), as quais foram comparadas às testemunhas com papuã durante o ciclo da soja (TCP) e sem papuã (TSP). Os efeitos dos tra tamentos foram estimados através de avaliações visuais de controle e pelo rendimento de grãos de soja. Todos os tratamentos com diclofop proporcionaram rendimentos estatisticamente equivalente s, os quais não se diferenciaram do controle sem papuã, embora tivessem apresentado rendimentos significativamente superiores ao daquele com papuã. Resultados das avaliações visuais, interpretados conjuntamente, evidenciaram que todas as combinações de doses e épocas de aplicação do diclofop controlaram eficientemente o papuã. As percentagens do controle alcançado, em relação às testemunhas , variaram de 68 a 99%, dependendo do tratamento e da época da avaliação. Contudo, as aplicações em POS-2 nas dosesde 1080 e 1440 g/ha e em POS-4 na dose de 1080 g/ha demonstraram maior eficiência em controlar papuã do que aquelas em PPI e em PRE à 720 g/ha.
Several herbicide mixtures were tested on cotton, (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in the main production areas of the State of Minas Gerais, Brasil. The cultivar "Minas Dona Beta", was used in the Metalúrgica region, whilst in Triângulo and Norte the cultivar employed was ."IAC-13-1", . In Triângulo litle regrowth occurred up to 30 days after application when the following mixtures were used: dinitramine + diuron, dinitroanilin + prometryne and pendimethalin + diuron. These treatments controlled 96.2%, 92.5% and 96.5% of the total weeds, respectively. When yields were compared, 1,962 Kg/ha were obtained in the best treatment (pendimethalin + diuron), against the control plots average of 1,130 Kg/ha. Tank mixtures of 2,00 Kg/ha of alachlor and 0.35 Kg/ha of metribuzin, or 3,00 Kg/ha of alachlor and 0,50 Kg/ha of metribuzin, and 1,00 Kg/ha of trifluralin and 0,50 Kg/ha of metribuzin were the most efficient in controlling grasses and dicotyledons. Effective weed control was recorded in Nor th of Minas Gerais when pendimethalin + diuron were applied expressed as: 86.4%, 83.6% and 70.3% of the total weeds after 30,50 and 80 days, respectively. The mixtures dinitramine + fluometuron and dinitroanilin + fluometuron showed the best results regard to a cotton yield of 1,532 Kg/ha, produced in the treated plots against only 229 kg/ha in the control (unhoed). The best combination for total weed control in the Metalúrgica region was dinitramine + diuron with an efficiency of 67% after 30 days. When differences in fiber production were considered, however, the best mixture was dinitramine + fluometuron, the treated plots yielding 831 kg/ha and the control 145 kg/ha.
Several herbicide mixtures were tested on cotton, (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in the main production areas of the State of Minas Gerais, Brasil. The cultivar "Minas Dona Beta", was used in the Metalúrgica region, whilst in Triângulo and Norte the cultivar employed was ."IAC-13-1", . In Triângulo litle regrowth occurred up to 30 days after application when the following mixtures were used: dinitramine + diuron, dinitroanilin + prometryne and pendimethalin + diuron. These treatments controlled 96.2%, 92.5% and 96.5% of the total weeds, respectively. When yields were compared, 1,962 Kg/ha were obtained in the best treatment (pendimethalin + diuron), against the control plots average of 1,130 Kg/ha. Tank mixtures of 2,00 Kg/ha of alachlor and 0.35 Kg/ha of metribuzin, or 3,00 Kg/ha of alachlor and 0,50 Kg/ha of metribuzin, and 1,00 Kg/ha of trifluralin and 0,50 Kg/ha of metribuzin were the most efficient in controlling grasses and dicotyledons. Effective weed control was recorded in Nor th of Minas Gerais when pendimethalin + diuron were applied expressed as: 86.4%, 83.6% and 70.3% of the total weeds after 30,50 and 80 days, respectively. The mixtures dinitramine + fluometuron and dinitroanilin + fluometuron showed the best results regard to a cotton yield of 1,532 Kg/ha, produced in the treated plots against only 229 kg/ha in the control (unhoed). The best combination for total weed control in the Metalúrgica region was dinitramine + diuron with an efficiency of 67% after 30 days. When differences in fiber production were considered, however, the best mixture was dinitramine + fluometuron, the treated plots yielding 831 kg/ha and the control 145 kg/ha.
| Reference Key |
fleck1979plantaaplicao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;N.G. Fleck |
| Journal | anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry |
| Year | 1979 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.