state versus state: who applies better eu law?

Clicks: 63
ID: 207876
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #206 of 221 articles by views in Environmental monitoring and assessment

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 221 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Each Member State is responsible for the implementation of EU Law within its own legal system. Non-compliance means failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations under EU Law. An action for failure to fulfil obligations directed against a Member State which has failed to comply with its obligations under European Union law may be brought by the Commission or by another Member State. In the history of European integration only six times one Member State has directly brought infringement proceedings against another State. Of the six cases, only four proceeded to judgment. The European Institutions and the Member States should continue to develop their work to ensure that EU law is correctly applied and implemented.
Reference Key
dimitriu2015challengesstate Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Ioana Mihaela DIMITRIU
Journal Environmental monitoring and assessment
Year 2015
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.