timss 2003 mathematics cognitive domains
Clicks: 15
ID: 205426
2002
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
4.2
/100
15 views
5 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #17 of 18 articles by views in malware 2018 - proceedings of the 2018 13th international conference on malicious and unwanted software
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Mathematical tasks can be classified in a number of ways. While Galbraith & Haines (2001), for example, distinguish among mechanical, interpretative and constructive tasks, Smith et at. (1996) divide tasks into the following three categories: (A) factual knowledge, comprehension and routine use of procedures; (B) information transfer and application in new situations; and (C) identifying and interpreting; implications, conjectures and comparisons and evaluation. Having briefly summarized these and some other mathematical tasks classifications, this paper presents and critically examines the TIMSS 2003 mathematics cognitive domains. As a part of the TIMSS 2003 project these cognitive domains - knowing facts and roles, vising concepts, solving routine problems, and reasoning - were operationalized for the content domain of algebra in grade 8 and the paper gives a sample of the developed tasks that are fully available on the Internet (see www.matf.bg.ac.yu/čdjk/drafl2.pdfanA www.matf.bg.ac.yn/čdjk/yu20item.pdf). Through the examination and operationalization of the TIMSS assessment framework several implications for research and professional development of mathematics teachers have been realized. The article presents three of them dealing with an elaborated item classification, its empirical validation and a didactical preparation of teachers including operationalizations of the chosen task classification/taxonomy.
| Reference Key |
m.2002zbornik:timss
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Kadijević Đorđe M. |
| Journal | malware 2018 - proceedings of the 2018 13th international conference on malicious and unwanted software |
| Year | 2002 |
| DOI |
10.2298/ZIPI0204096K
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.