las tasas máximas de interés convencional y el delito de usura en nuestro país, luego de la vigencia de la ley 17.569

Clicks: 138
ID: 204351
2014
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #117 of 148 articles by views in Toxins

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 148 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Contenido: Introducción. Indicación sumaria de las pautas diferenciales entre el Decreto - Ley 14.887 de 27 de abril de 1979 y la Ley 17.569 de 22 de octubre de 2002. La coexistencia de ambas leyes.La obligación dineraria. Ley 5.180 de 24 de diciembre de 1914. Artículo 52 de la constitución. La Ley 14.095 de 17 de noviembre de 1972.  Decreto - Ley 14.500 de 17 de marzo de 1976. El Decreto - Ley 14.887 de 27 de abril de 1979 y su decreto reglamentario 450/79. Ley 17.569 de 22 de octubre 2002. Juicio crítico. Conclusiones
Reference Key
mercader2014revistalas Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Teresita Mercader
Journal Toxins
Year 2014
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://revista.fder.edu.uy/index.php/rfd/article/view/233
Keywords
comparative and uniform law jurisprudencesocial sciences (general) decreto 450/979law in general

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.