payment for environmental services (pes) and environmental rationality: approximations

Clicks: 233
ID: 202764
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #21 of 43 articles by views in epilepsy & behavior : e&b

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study aims to investigate if the Payment for Environmental Services (PES), in some formats and contexts of development, can help building environmental rationality (Leff). In this light, the initial of the essay are the economic instruments of environmental management aimed at correcting market failures. In sequence, the different patterns of PES programs in Brazil are analyzed. In this context, it is argued if PES is chained to a policy of environmental precification (in a monetary sense) or if PES is an economic incentive (positive sanction). Towards the end of the present article, it is argued about a possible approximation of PES and the concepts of ecological rationalization. The methodology used in this article is based in literature review and document analysis.
Reference Key
jodas2015scientiapayment Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Natália Jodas;Cristiane Derani
Journal epilepsy & behavior : e&b
Year 2015
DOI
10.5433/2178-8189.2015v19n1p9
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.