morpho-semantic rereading of the etruscan term tuŚurΘi(r)
Clicks: 6
ID: 202386
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
1.5
/100
6 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #119 of 144 articles by views in south african journal of botany
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 144 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The Etruscan term tuśurθi(r) has been interpreted up to the date as a nominative and translated as ‘consort’. A detailed analysis of morphology in this term and, especially, a comparative study with syntactic Etruscan structures and with elements of cultural Greco-Roman method, they allow to see, in clear continuity with the intuitions of Pallottino and Rix, a plural locative in the same one. This hypothesis helps to confirm, in addition, the hierarchy of animated nouns in the distribution of the different marks of plural in Etruscan.
| Reference Key |
montero2009emeritamorpho-semantic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Roberto López Montero |
| Journal | south african journal of botany |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.3989/emerita.2009.v77.i2.317
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.