'n kritiese evaluering van die kritiek van f. n. lion-cachet
Clicks: 107
ID: 202015
1984
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
107 views
5 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #128 of 214 articles by views in BMC emergency medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 214 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In antwoord op Lion-Cachet (1984:38-51) se kritiek op ’n ABC van Bybeluitleg sou ’n mens meer as een weg kon opgaan. Een moontlikheid sou wees om een-een die verskilpunte op te noem en ad hoc daarop te reageer. ’n Paar voorbeelde uit dié benadering:
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (44 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
deist1984in'n
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;F. E. Deist |
| Journal | BMC emergency medicine |
| Year | 1984 |
| DOI |
10.4102/ids.v18i72.1234
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.