ship emissions measurement in the arctic by plume intercepts of the canadian coast guard icebreaker amundsen from the polar 6 aircraft platform
Clicks: 117
ID: 201481
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
116 views
7 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Decreasing sea ice and increasing marine navigability in northern latitudes
have changed Arctic ship traffic patterns in recent years and are predicted
to increase annual ship traffic in the Arctic in the future. Development of
effective regulations to manage environmental impacts of shipping requires an
understanding of ship emissions and atmospheric processing in the Arctic
environment. As part of the summer 2014 NETCARE (Network on Climate and
Aerosols) campaign, the plume dispersion and gas and particle emission
factors of effluents originating from the Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker
Amundsen operating near Resolute Bay, NU, Canada, were investigated. The
Amundsen burned distillate fuel with 1.5 wt % sulfur. Emissions were
studied via plume intercepts using the Polar 6 aircraft measurements, an
analytical plume dispersion model, and using the FLEXPART-WRF Lagrangian
particle dispersion model. The first plume intercept by the research aircraft
was carried out on 19 July 2014 during the operation of the Amundsen in the
open water. The second and third plume intercepts were carried out on 20 and
21 July 2014 when the Amundsen had reached the ice edge and operated under
ice-breaking conditions. Typical of Arctic marine navigation, the engine load
was low compared to cruising conditions for all of the plume intercepts. The
measured species included mixing ratios of CO2, NOx, CO, SO2,
particle number concentration (CN), refractory black carbon (rBC), and cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN). The results were compared to similar experimental
studies in mid-latitudes.
Plume expansion rates (γ) were calculated using the analytical model and found to be γ = 0.75 ± 0.81, 0.93 ± 0.37, and 1.19 ± 0.39 for plumes 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These rates were smaller than prior studies conducted at mid-latitudes, likely due to polar boundary layer dynamics, including reduced turbulent mixing compared to mid-latitudes. All emission factors were in agreement with prior observations at low engine loads in mid-latitudes. Ice-breaking increased the NOx emission factor from EFNOx = 43.1 ± 15.2 to 71.6 ± 9.68 and 71.4 ± 4.14 g kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1, 2, and 3, likely due to changes in combustion temperatures. The CO emission factor was EFCO = 137 ± 120, 12.5 ± 3.70 and 8.13 ± 1.34 g kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1, 2, and 3. The rBC emission factor was EFrBC = 0.202 ± 0.052 and 0.202 ± 0.125 g kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1 and 2. The CN emission factor was reduced while ice-breaking from EFCN = 2.41 ± 0.47 to 0.45 ± 0.082 and 0.507 ± 0.037 × 1016 kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1, 2, and 3. At 0.6 % supersaturation, the CCN emission factor was comparable to observations in mid-latitudes at low engine loads with EFCCN = 3.03 ± 0.933, 1.39 ± 0.319, and 0.650 ± 0.136 × 1014 kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1, 2, and 3.
Plume expansion rates (γ) were calculated using the analytical model and found to be γ = 0.75 ± 0.81, 0.93 ± 0.37, and 1.19 ± 0.39 for plumes 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These rates were smaller than prior studies conducted at mid-latitudes, likely due to polar boundary layer dynamics, including reduced turbulent mixing compared to mid-latitudes. All emission factors were in agreement with prior observations at low engine loads in mid-latitudes. Ice-breaking increased the NOx emission factor from EFNOx = 43.1 ± 15.2 to 71.6 ± 9.68 and 71.4 ± 4.14 g kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1, 2, and 3, likely due to changes in combustion temperatures. The CO emission factor was EFCO = 137 ± 120, 12.5 ± 3.70 and 8.13 ± 1.34 g kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1, 2, and 3. The rBC emission factor was EFrBC = 0.202 ± 0.052 and 0.202 ± 0.125 g kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1 and 2. The CN emission factor was reduced while ice-breaking from EFCN = 2.41 ± 0.47 to 0.45 ± 0.082 and 0.507 ± 0.037 × 1016 kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1, 2, and 3. At 0.6 % supersaturation, the CCN emission factor was comparable to observations in mid-latitudes at low engine loads with EFCCN = 3.03 ± 0.933, 1.39 ± 0.319, and 0.650 ± 0.136 × 1014 kg-diesel−1 for plumes 1, 2, and 3.
| Reference Key |
aliabadi2016atmosphericship
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;A. A. Aliabadi;A. A. Aliabadi;J. L. Thomas;A. B. Herber;R. M. Staebler;W. R. Leaitch;H. Schulz;K. S. Law;L. Marelle;L. Marelle;J. Burkart;M. D. Willis;H. Bozem;P. M. Hoor;F. Köllner;J. Schneider;M. Levasseur;J. P. D. Abbatt |
| Journal | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.5194/acp-16-7899-2016
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.