balanced reconnection intervals: four case studies
Clicks: 99
ID: 200848
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
29.4
/100
99 views
16 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #303 of 484 articles by views in journal of food measurement and characterization
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 484 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
During steady magnetospheric convection (SMC) events the magnetosphere is
active, yet there are no data signatures of a large scale reconfiguration,
such as a substorm. While this definition has been used for years it fails to
elucidate the true physics that is occurring within the magnetosphere, which
is that the dayside merging rate and the nightside reconnection rate balance.
Thus, it is suggested that these events be renamed Balanced Reconnection
Intervals (BRIs). This paper investigates four diverse BRI events that
support the idea that new name for these events is needed. The 3–4 February
1998 event falls well into the classic definition of an SMC set forth by
Sergeev et al. (1996), while the other challenge some previous notions about
SMCs. The 15 February 1998 event fails to end with a substorm expansion and
concludes as the magnetospheric activity slowly quiets. The third event,
22–23 December 2000, begins with a slow build up of magnetospheric activity,
thus there is no initiating substorm expansion. The last event, 17 February
1998, is more active (larger AE, AL and cross polar cap potential) than
previously studied SMCs. It also has more small scale activity than the other
events studied here.
| Reference Key |
dejong2008annalesbalanced
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;A. D. DeJong;A. D. DeJong;A. J. Ridley;C. R. Clauer |
| Journal | journal of food measurement and characterization |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
10.5194/angeo-26-3897-2008
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.