health education: a baby show as an evaluation tool
Clicks: 80
ID: 200699
1997
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
23.7
/100
80 views
5 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #747 of 812 articles by views in Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 812 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Health education is an essential ingredient of primary health care but its impact is difficult to evaluate. Where evaluation does occur, the research methods often require major expenditure of manpower, time and money. In addition, despite the importance of incorporating the primary health care goal of promoting participation in health, the subjects of the research often become victims yet again, gaining no visible benefits from the process in a situation where they have many basic needs which are not met.
| Reference Key |
couper1997curationishealth
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;I. D. Couper |
| Journal | Materials (Basel, Switzerland) |
| Year | 1997 |
| DOI |
10.4102/curationis.v20i2.1304
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.