currículo de história e educação para o patrimônio history study program and heritage education

Clicks: 105
ID: 200574
2008
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #43 of 52 articles by views in antioxidants

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Quantas potencialidades tem o currículo de história em relação à educação para o patrimônio? Como o professor de história pode realizar este compromisso? Com qual progressão dos conhecimentos significativos e das operações cognitivas? Com quais estratégias didáticas? Com quais processos de aprendizagem? Para responder a tais perguntas, raciocinarei, primeiramente, sobre a relação entre as marcas do passado, o território, os bens culturais e o patrimônio, valendo-me, principalmente, das contribuições de Cicerchia (2004), Branchesi (2006), Gardner (1991; 1993), Nardi (1996) e Pansini (2004). Os quatro termos compõem um mapa conceitual que pode orientar as escolhas curriculares, nos diferentes níveis da educação básica. A seguir, apresentarei, em linhas gerais, uma proposta de currículo que vimos amadurencendo ao longo dos anos de atividade docente e de pesquisadores (I. MaTTOZZIi, e TONTO, G. Di (a c. di), 2000; MATTOZZI, I. (a cura di), 2005; MATTOZZI, I. 1990; MATTOZZI, I. 1990), ressaltando como esta pode servir para a educação para o patrimônio e contribuir para a formação histórica de crianças e adolescentes.
What are the different potentials of history study programs concerning the heritage education? How can history teachers fulfill this commitment? What is the progress of meaningful knowledge and of cognitive operations? Which educational strategies are to be used and with which learning processes? To answer these questions, I will first analyze the relation between marks of the past, territory, cultural goods, and heritage based on the contributions of CICERCHIA 2004, BRANCHESI 2006, GARDNER 1991 and 1993, NARDI 1996, and PANSINI 2004. These four aspects make up a conceptual map that may guide study program choices at the different levels of basic education. Next, I will briefly present a study program proposal that I have developed along the years as a history teacher and researcher (I. Mattozzi, and TONTO, G. Di (a c. di), 2000; MATTOZZI, I. (a cura di), 2005; MATTOZZI, I. 1990; MATTOZZI, I. 1990). I will point out how it can serve heritage education and contribute to the education of children and teenagers on history.
Reference Key
mattozzi2008educaocurrculo Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ivo Mattozzi
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal antioxidants
Year 2008
DOI
10.1590/S0102-46982008000100009
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-46982008000100009
Keywords
heritage education and citizenshipeducation (general)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.