qualidade das informações sobre aleitamento materno e alimentação complementar em sites brasileiros de profissionais de saúde disponíveis na internet the quality of information on maternal breast feeding and complementary feeding on brazilian internet sites available for health professionals
Clicks: 334
ID: 200116
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
73.4
/100
334 views
227 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #12 of 47 articles by views in sociology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJETIVOS: analisar as informações de sites da internet sobre o aleitamento materno e alimentação complementar de acordo com a adequação às recomendações do Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. MÉTODOS: realizado estudo transversal, com amostra de 103 sites de profissionais de saúde. Analisaram-se informações sobre aleitamento materno (AM) e alimentação complementar (AC). As informações foram quantificadas e analisadas qualitativamente. RESULTADOS: as recomendações relativas ao AM foram: exclusivo até 6º mês (64,1%); sem água e chá (31,1%); duração de dois anos ou mais (36,9%); e não utilizar mamadeira e chupeta (33%). Para a AC foi utilizada a terminologia desmame (30,1%), recomendada a introdução alimentar no 6º mês (47,9%), introdução da primeira papa com fruta (11,6%) ou suco (9,7%); e a oferta de sopa (14,6%) como refeição. Na análise qualitativa, entre as informações incorretas, constavam recomendações de consumo de carne no 12º mês, horários regulares para refeições, introdução de alimentos no 7º mês e consumo de leite de vaca no 6º mês. CONCLUSÕES: a maior parte das informações sobre aleitamento materno está de acordo com o preconizado pelo Ministério da Saúde, mas são insuficientes para estimular a prática do aleitamento materno. Já as informações sobre alimentação complementar na sua maioria divergem do recomendado.
OBJECTIVES: to analyze the information available on internet sites regarding maternal breast feeding and complementary feeding according to the recommendations of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. METHODS: a cross-sectional study was carried out using a sample of 103 sites for professional healthcare workers. Information was analyzed on maternal breast feeding (MB) and complementary feeding (CF). The information was quantified and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: the recommendations for MB were: that it should be exclusive up to the 6th month of life (64.1%); that no water or tea should be added (31.1%); that it should last for two years or more (36.9%); and that bottles and/or pacifiers should not be used (33%). For CF, the term weaning was used (30.1%), it was recommended that solid feeding begin in the 6th month of life (47.9%), involving fruit pulp (11.6%) or juice (9.7%); and soup (14.6%). According to the qualitative analysis, incorrect information included recommending the consumption of meat in the 12th month of life, regular meals, the introduction of solid food in the 7th month and the consumption of cow's milk in the 6th month. CONCLUSIONS: most of the information on breast feeding accords with the advice of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, but is not sufficient to encourage breast feeding. The information on complementary feeding mostly diverges from the official recommendations.
OBJECTIVES: to analyze the information available on internet sites regarding maternal breast feeding and complementary feeding according to the recommendations of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. METHODS: a cross-sectional study was carried out using a sample of 103 sites for professional healthcare workers. Information was analyzed on maternal breast feeding (MB) and complementary feeding (CF). The information was quantified and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: the recommendations for MB were: that it should be exclusive up to the 6th month of life (64.1%); that no water or tea should be added (31.1%); that it should last for two years or more (36.9%); and that bottles and/or pacifiers should not be used (33%). For CF, the term weaning was used (30.1%), it was recommended that solid feeding begin in the 6th month of life (47.9%), involving fruit pulp (11.6%) or juice (9.7%); and soup (14.6%). According to the qualitative analysis, incorrect information included recommending the consumption of meat in the 12th month of life, regular meals, the introduction of solid food in the 7th month and the consumption of cow's milk in the 6th month. CONCLUSIONS: most of the information on breast feeding accords with the advice of the Brazilian Ministry of Health, but is not sufficient to encourage breast feeding. The information on complementary feeding mostly diverges from the official recommendations.
| Reference Key |
silva2010revistaqualidade
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Rosângela Quirino da Silva;Muriel Bauermann Gubert |
| Journal | sociology |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S1519-38292010000300006
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.