Using fluoride mouthrinses before or after toothbrushing: effect on erosive tooth wear.
Clicks: 345
ID: 19844
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
70.5
/100
345 views
242 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #9 of 18 articles by views in Archives of oral biology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
1. To evaluate the use of fluoridated mouthrinses before or after toothbrushing on erosive tooth wear. 2. To compare the anti-erosive effect of the combination toothpaste and mouthrinse containing fluoride, with or without stannous chloride.Enamel and dentin specimens were randomly distributed into groups (n = 10 of each substrate/group): B-brushing, B + R-brushing + rinsing, and R + B-rinsing + brushing. The treatments were performed using a fluoride toothpaste (B: 1400 ppm fluoride, as amino fluoride-AmF) combined or not with a fluoride mouthrinse (R: 250 ppm fluoride, as AmF and sodium fluoride-NaF) or fluoride and stannous toothpaste (B: 1400 ppm fluoride, as AmF and NaF, 3500 ppm stannous, as stannous chloride-SnCl and 0.5% chitosan) combined or not with fluoride and stannous mouthrinse (R: 500 ppm fluoride, as AmF and NaF, 800 ppm stannous, as SnCl). As control, brushing was performed with artificial saliva (B). Specimens were submitted to a 5-day erosive-abrasive cycling model. Treatments were performed twice daily. Surface loss (SL) was determined by optical profilometry. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Games-Howell tests (α = 0.05).For enamel, R+B and R+B presented significantly lower SL than the control, with R+B being significantly lower than R+B. For dentin, B had the lowest SL, not differing from B+R R+B and B. Groups R+B and B+R showed highest SL, not differing from B and B.For enamel, the use of a mouthrinse before brushing was able to reduce erosive wear for both fluoride and stannous products. For dentin, the use of stannous-containing products, irrespective of the order of application, presented superior effects.
| Reference Key |
machado2019usingarchives
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Machado, Alana Cristina;Bezerra, Sávio José Cardoso;João-Souza, Samira Helena;Caetano, Tainá Mautone;Russo, Luciano Citadini;Carvalho, Thiago Saads;Scaramucci, Taís; |
| Journal | Archives of oral biology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S0003-9969(19)30443-1
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.