comparison of kinetic-based and artificial neural network modeling methods for a pilot scale vacuum gas oil hydrocracking reactor

Clicks: 265
ID: 198075
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #13 of 43 articles by views

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
An artificial neural network (ANN) and kinetic-based models for a pilot scale vacuum gas oil (VGO) hydrocracking plant are presented in this paper. Reported experimental data in the literature were used to develop, train, and check these models. The proposed models are capable of predicting the yield of all main hydrocracking products including dry gas, light naphtha, heavy naphtha, kerosene, diesel, and unconverted VGO (residue). Results showed that kinetic-based and artificial neural models have specific capabilities to predict yield of hydrocracking products. The former is able to accurately predict the yield of lighter products, i.e. light naphtha, heavy naphtha and kerosene. However, ANN model is capable of predicting yields of diesel and residue with higher precision. The comparison shows that the ANN model is superior to the kinetic-base models.  © 2013 BCREC UNDIP. All rights reserved

Received: 9th April 2013; Revised: 13rd August 2013; Accepted: 18th August 2013

[How to Cite: Sadighi, S., Zahedi, G.R. (2013). Comparison of Kinetic-based and Artificial Neural Network Modeling Methods for a Pilot Scale Vacuum Gas Oil Hydrocracking Reactor. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 8 (2): 125-136. (doi:10.9767/bcrec.8.2.4722.125-136)]

[Permalink/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9767/bcrec.8.2.4722.125-136]

Reference Key
sadighi2013bulletincomparison Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Sepehr Sadighi;Gholam Reza Zahedi
Journal Journal not linked
Year 2013
DOI
10.9767/bcrec.8.2.4722.125-136
URL
http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/bcrec/article/view/4722
Keywords
artificial neural network modeling kinetic

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.