nas fronteiras do "humano": os debates britânico e brasileiro sobre a pesquisa com embriões
Clicks: 303
ID: 197830
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
303 views
32 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 50 articles by views in clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the british society for allergy and clinical immunology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Com o advento das técnicas de fertilização in vitro no final da década de 70, abriu-se um debate mundial sobre o estatuto do embrião produzido em laboratório, assim como sua manipulação experimental na pesquisa científica. O objetivo do artigo é analisar comparativamente dois destes debates no âmbito dos parlamentos britânico e brasileiro. O primeiro resultou na Human Fertilisation and Embriology Act de 1990, e o segundo, nas disposições da Lei de Biossegurança de 2005 relativas às células-tronco embrionárias. A análise, partindo da literatura antropológica sobre o tema, pretendeu demonstrar não só a abertura contemporânea das fronteiras do "humano" a uma negociação explicitamente política, como também os principais vetores que vêm conformando tais negociações no caso da pesquisa científica com embriões humanos.
Following the arrival of in vitro fertilization techniques at the end of the seventies, a worldwide debate soon flourished on the status of the embryo produced within the laboratory and on its use in experimental scientific research. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and compare two of these debates as they unfolded in the British and Brazilian Parliaments. The former resulted in the 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, while the latter led to the provisions of the 2005 Biosafety Law concerning embryonic stem cell research. Exploring the anthropological literature on the topic, the analysis aims to show not only the contemporary opening up of the borders of the 'human' to explicitly political forms of negotiation, but also the main vectors directing such negotiations in the case of scientific research using human embryos.
Following the arrival of in vitro fertilization techniques at the end of the seventies, a worldwide debate soon flourished on the status of the embryo produced within the laboratory and on its use in experimental scientific research. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and compare two of these debates as they unfolded in the British and Brazilian Parliaments. The former resulted in the 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, while the latter led to the provisions of the 2005 Biosafety Law concerning embryonic stem cell research. Exploring the anthropological literature on the topic, the analysis aims to show not only the contemporary opening up of the borders of the 'human' to explicitly political forms of negotiation, but also the main vectors directing such negotiations in the case of scientific research using human embryos.
| Reference Key |
cesarino2007mananas
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Letícia da Nóbrega Cesarino |
| Journal | clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the british society for allergy and clinical immunology |
| Year | 2007 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0104-93132007000200003
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.