o triunfo da vontade: Ésquilo nos limites da imaginação acadêmica
Clicks: 247
ID: 197799
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
247 views
21 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #49 of 324 articles by views in Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 324 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Ever since its creation, Aeschylean tragedy has been the object of innumerable hermeneutical studies, though not always guided by the same questions and concepts. This article aims to identify the general contours that have guided current understandings of these texts and to examine how these contours have limited scholarly readings of Aeschylus in the twentieth century.
| Reference Key |
benthien2004revistao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Rafael Faraco Benthien |
| Journal | Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
10.11606/issn.2316-9141.v0i151p73-111
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.