documentary images:aesthetic subjectivities e apolitical

Clicks: 216
ID: 196873
2014
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #30 of 41 articles by views in annals of the new york academy of sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study intends to analyze images in three categories of films that contemplate dictatorial political regimes: documentaries, films based on real facts and feature films. I argue that images of the three categories can document “factuality” and are what I call “documental images”. Furthermore, they can contribute for a “metamorphosis-memory”, a kind of memory that reconstructs itself continuously according to new representations of dictatorships in films. The frame of reference includes theories by Bakhtin, Baudrillard, Benjamin, Debord, Derrida, Halbwachs,Metz, Nichols and Sarlo, among others.
Reference Key
araujo2014discursosdocumentary Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Denize Correa Araujo
Journal annals of the new york academy of sciences
Year 2014
DOI
10.5433/1984-7939.2014v10n17p87
URL
http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/discursosfotograficos/article/view/19793
Keywords
mass media photographycommunication

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.