decolonization of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus during routine hospital care: efficacy and long-term follow-up
Clicks: 182
ID: 195423
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
182 views
47 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #48 of 94 articles by views in zdravstveno varstvo
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization is associated with a significant risk of subsequent MRSA infection in the hospital setting. The use of decolonization as an infection control strategy remains highly controversial despite publications evaluating more than 40 different decolonization regimens over the past 60 years. The present study describes the benefits and potential drawbacks of such an approach in the patient population.
| Reference Key |
dow2010canadiandecolonization
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Gordon Dow;Deanna Field;Michelina Mancuso;Jacques Allard |
| Journal | zdravstveno varstvo |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.1155/2010/590530
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.