relevant interpretation of stoic logic
Clicks: 79
ID: 195348
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
23.4
/100
79 views
17 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #62 of 62 articles by views in applied energy
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This article is going to study the relevant interpretation of stoic logic. Regarding this, first of all two main views with regard to the conditional propositions in stoic logic are examined. According to the first view which is emphasized by Becker and Egli the conditional proposition used in syntactic system of stoic logic is Philonic while based on the second view which is presented by some people such as Stopper, Nasieniewski, and Barnes this conditional proposition is the relevant conditional proposition. The first view has confronted important challenges including the paradoxes of material requirement of which the Stoics are aware and were working to fix them in their logical system. But the second view not only does not have the paradoxes of material requirements but also resolves the paradoxes of strict requirements. Therefore, in the second part of the article, according to Nasieniewski, the relevant formulation of conditional part of stoic logic is presented, and finally based on the left stoic sources, we are going to study the problems of such an interpretation
| Reference Key |
shahverdi2016metaphysikrelevant
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Amin Shahverdi;Mohammad Ali Ejeii |
| Journal | applied energy |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.22108/mph.2016.20516
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.