a 2-year follow-up study of patients on automated peritoneal dialysis

Clicks: 237
ID: 194662
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #17 of 47 articles by views in journal of the chemical society - perkin transactions 1

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is increasingly being used for the treatment of end stage renal disease. We present our experience of APD at a government run tertiary care institute. APD was initiated for 22 patients between 2002 and 2010. On comparing APD and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, no difference in patient survival and technique survival was observed. CAPD patients had higher number of peritonitis episodes, greater decline in the serum albumin and a greater number of patients failed to achieve adequacy targets compared to APD.
Reference Key
rao2013indiana Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;C Shyam Sunder Rao;P Charan;G Diwaker Naidu;G Swarnalatha;R Ram;K V Dakshinamurty
Journal journal of the chemical society - perkin transactions 1
Year 2013
DOI
10.4103/0971-4065.116292
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.