review: lesley noaks & emma wincup (2004). criminological research—understanding qualitative methods / mark r. pogrebin (ed.) (2003). qualitative approaches to criminal justice—perspectives from the field
Clicks: 267
ID: 193700
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
267 views
43 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #393 of 729 articles by views in molecules
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 729 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This review essay provides a brief introduction to the use of qualitative methods in criminological research, before moving on to describe the content of the two books. The books are quite different in a number of ways. NOAKS and WINCUP take the "how to do it" approach, making the book very useful for students and researchers new to qualitative methods. In contrast, POGREBIN's edited collection provides a large number of "how it has been done" examples with an equal focus on the findings as on the methodological approach. Although both books devote space to ethical dilemmas, the nature of the dilemmas and how they are resolved varies. This is probably due to the age of some of the chapters within POGREBIN's book (all are reprints and date back to 1973) but may also reflect different ethical stances in the USA and UK.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503130
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (150 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
westmarland2005forum:review:
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Nicole Westmarland |
| Journal | molecules |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.