criminal evidence : democracy, relevance to the implementation of accusatory system and efficiency of the oral evidence
Clicks: 234
ID: 193604
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
234 views
130 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 3 articles by views in npj schizophrenia
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The so-called principle of real truth is argument to justify arbitrary procedures used in criminal proceedings. A perfect reproduction of the scene of a crime is impossible. The production of evidence in democratic societies must be guided by the adversarial system . However, not enough positivization affections precepts to this systematic procedure. It is necessary that the practice of instruction acts reveal democratic conduct by the authorities responsible for conducting the process. Only then the proof shall be realizing the fundamental rights and guarantees that subject to criminal prosecution.
| Reference Key |
domingues2016revistacriminal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Ricardo Alves Domingues;Gustavo Noronha de Avila |
| Journal | npj schizophrenia |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0200/2016.v2i1.850
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.