selected results of a model validation exercise
Clicks: 139
ID: 193315
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
139 views
14 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #22 of 25 articles by views in proceedings of the 2017 ieee russia section young researchers in electrical and electronic engineering conference, elconrus 2017
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The concentration fields calculated with three Gaussian models and one Lagrangian dispersion model are validated against a set of SF<sub>6</sub> concentration data provided by the German environmental programme BWPLUS. The source was a pig fattening unit in fairly flat terrain. The results reveal that, in flat terrain with steady undisturbed flow, the use of Gauss models is still justified, whereas Lagrangian models should be used whenever the flow is modified by obstacles or topography.
| Reference Key |
piringer2009advancesselected
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;M. Piringer;K. Baumann-Stanzer |
| Journal | proceedings of the 2017 ieee russia section young researchers in electrical and electronic engineering conference, elconrus 2017 |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.