covered bonds vs. assets securitization
Clicks: 184
ID: 192928
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
184 views
55 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #54 of 93 articles by views in 2019 ieee 6th international conference on industrial engineering and applications, iciea 2019
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
During the past few years, in the recent post-crisis global banking and
capital markets context, financial institutions around the globe are exploring new
options to better secure their financing and refinancing demands. We will exhibit
herewith a comparison between covered bonds and asset securitizations as
financial markets-based funding techniques, highlighting certain key structuring
and implementation specifics on each of them.
| Reference Key |
dinc2014theoreticalcovered
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Silviu Eduard DINCĂ |
| Journal | 2019 ieee 6th international conference on industrial engineering and applications, iciea 2019 |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.