a unified and comprehensible view of parametric and kernel methods for genomic prediction with application to rice

Clicks: 249
ID: 192564
2016
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #168 of 264 articles by views in chemical record (new york, ny)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 264 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
One objective of this study was to provide readers with a clear and unified understanding ofparametric statistical and kernel methods, used for genomic prediction, and to compare some ofthese in the context of rice breeding for quantitative traits. Furthermore, another objective wasto provide a simple and user-friendly R package, named KRMM, which allows users to performRKHS regression with several kernels. After introducing the concept of regularized empiricalrisk minimization, the connections between well-known parametric and kernel methods suchas Ridge regression (i.e. genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP)) and reproducingkernel Hilbert space (RKHS) regression were reviewed. Ridge regression was then reformulatedso as to show and emphasize the advantage of the kernel trick concept, exploited by kernelmethods in the context of epistatic genetic architectures, over parametric frameworks used byconventional methods. Some parametric and kernel methods; least absolute shrinkage andselection operator (LASSO), GBLUP, support vector machine regression (SVR) and RKHSregression were thereupon compared for their genomic predictive ability in the context of ricebreeding using three real data sets. Among the compared methods, RKHS regression and SVRwere often the most accurate methods for prediction followed by GBLUP and LASSO. An Rfunction which allows users to perform RR-BLUP of marker effects, GBLUP and RKHS regression,with a Gaussian, Laplacian, polynomial or ANOVA kernel, in a reasonable computation time hasbeen developed. Moreover, a modified version of this function, which allows users to tune kernelsfor RKHS regression, has also been developed and parallelized for HPC Linux clusters. The corresponding KRMM package and all scripts have been made publicly available.
Reference Key
jacquin2016frontiersa Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Laval Jacquin;Tuong-Vi Cao;Nourollah Ahmadi
Journal chemical record (new york, ny)
Year 2016
DOI
10.3389/fgene.2016.00145
URL
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2016.00145/full
Keywords
genomic prediction epistasis kernel “trick”genetics

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.