mercados económicos y patología narcisista ante el trasfondo de la discusión en torno al concepto de rol economic markets and narcissistic pathology considering the discussion around the concept of role
Clicks: 96
ID: 191652
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
28.5
/100
96 views
3 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #15 of 15 articles by views in pharmaceutisch weekblad
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
La psicología últimamente ha prestado un grado de atención creciente a la incidencia de factores sociales en ciertos fenómenos individuales tradicionalmente abordados por las psicologías clínicas clásicas. Esta preocupación por sistematizar la relación entre la sociedad y el ámbito de lo individual-subjetivo ha resaltado la necesidad de repensar estas relaciones de reciprocidad desde una perspectiva diferente a la de los paradigmas tradicionales. Al problematizar la relación entre el sujeto y la sociedad, en términos generales, se pueden distinguir dos modelos de sociedad, una forma colectivista y otra individualista, que, a su vez conllevan una cierta preconcepción implícita acerca de cómo pensar las relaciones entre sujeto y sociedad. A partir de una revisión crítica del concepto de rol, que se ofrece como la visagra entre el terreno de lo subjetivo y el campo de lo social, se proponen algunos elementos para la construcción de una teoría crítica de la subjetividad. Dicha teoría, más que un hecho acabado, es un desafío pendiente, que pretende situarse más allá de las distinciones academicistas y las diferencias ortodoxas, impuestas por la hegemonía discursiva de los "grandes metarrelatos". Finalmente, mediante el análisis del desempleo masivo y de las patologías narcisistas, se ejemplifica lo expuesto con anterioridad
Psychology has recently demonstrated an increasing degree of attention concerning the influence of social factors on certain individual phenomena, traditionally handled by classical clinical psychologies. This concern about the systematization of the relationship between society and the individual-subjective's domain has emphasized the need to re-think the relations of reciprocity from another perspective, different than that propposed by traditional paradigms. Focussing in the relation between the subject and society, in general terms, two models of society can be distinguished, a collectivistic and an individualistic form, that, on the other hand, involve a certain implicit preconception on how relations between the subject and society have to be thought. From a critical revision of the concept of role some elements for a construction of a critical theory of subjectivity are propposed. Such a theory, more than an accomplished fact, is a pendant challenge that pretends to situate itself beyond academic distinctions and orthodox differences, imposed by the discursive hegemony of the "huge metanarrations". Finally, by the analysis of narcissist pathologies and massive unemployment, the previously exposed is illustrated
Psychology has recently demonstrated an increasing degree of attention concerning the influence of social factors on certain individual phenomena, traditionally handled by classical clinical psychologies. This concern about the systematization of the relationship between society and the individual-subjective's domain has emphasized the need to re-think the relations of reciprocity from another perspective, different than that propposed by traditional paradigms. Focussing in the relation between the subject and society, in general terms, two models of society can be distinguished, a collectivistic and an individualistic form, that, on the other hand, involve a certain implicit preconception on how relations between the subject and society have to be thought. From a critical revision of the concept of role some elements for a construction of a critical theory of subjectivity are propposed. Such a theory, more than an accomplished fact, is a pendant challenge that pretends to situate itself beyond academic distinctions and orthodox differences, imposed by the discursive hegemony of the "huge metanarrations". Finally, by the analysis of narcissist pathologies and massive unemployment, the previously exposed is illustrated
| Reference Key |
brunnhuber2004psykhemercados
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Stefan Brunnhuber;Niklas Bornhauser |
| Journal | pharmaceutisch weekblad |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.