avaliação tardia em rinoplastia estética em um centro acadêmico de referência long-term evaluation in aesthetic rhinoplasty in an academic referral center
Clicks: 238
ID: 191629
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
238 views
25 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #38 of 89 articles by views in cardiovascular diabetology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A cirurgia estética tem por fundamento a melhora estética dos pacientes. O resultado das cirurgias é avaliado de modo subjetivo na maioria dos serviços. OBJETIVO: Avaliar objetivamente o grau de satisfação dos pacientes um ano após a rinoplastia, utilizando o questionário Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation, num centro acadêmico de referência. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram selecionados 69 pacientes no serviço de otorrinolaringologia, operados por médicos residentes do terceiro ano no período de Janeiro a Dezembro de 2007 que responderam o questionário traduzido pelos autores do estudo. RESULTADO: Obtivemos uma média de 73,25% de grau de satisfação para rinoplastia primária e 72,02% para secundária. CONCLUSÃO: O grau de satisfação apresentado pelos pacientes foi considerado muito bom.
Plastic surgery is based on improving esthetic for the patient. In most services, the surgery outcome is evaluated in a subjective manner. AIM: to objectively assess the degree of patient satisfaction one year after rhinoplasty using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire at a referral academic center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 69 patients operated in the otorhinolaryngology service were selected. The patients were operated upon by third year residents during the period from January to December 2007 and answered the questionnaire translated by the authors of this study. RESULTS: we obtained a mean value of 73.25% of satisfaction for primary rhinoplasty and a mean value of 72.02% of satisfaction for secondary rhinoplasty. CONCLUSION: the level of satisfaction presented by the patients was considered to be very good.
Plastic surgery is based on improving esthetic for the patient. In most services, the surgery outcome is evaluated in a subjective manner. AIM: to objectively assess the degree of patient satisfaction one year after rhinoplasty using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire at a referral academic center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 69 patients operated in the otorhinolaryngology service were selected. The patients were operated upon by third year residents during the period from January to December 2007 and answered the questionnaire translated by the authors of this study. RESULTS: we obtained a mean value of 73.25% of satisfaction for primary rhinoplasty and a mean value of 72.02% of satisfaction for secondary rhinoplasty. CONCLUSION: the level of satisfaction presented by the patients was considered to be very good.
| Reference Key |
faidiga2010brazilianavaliao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Gabriel Bijos Faidiga;Lucas Rodrigues Carenzi;Camila Carrara Yassuda;Flavia Silveira;Tassiana do Lago;Marcelo Gonçalves Junqueira Leite;Wilma Terezinha Anselmo-Lima |
| Journal | cardiovascular diabetology |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S1808-86942010000400006
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.