commonly observed shortcomings in manuscripts submitted to management journals
Clicks: 131
ID: 191514
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
1.8
/100
6 views
6 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
We outline commonly noticed shortcomings and ways to overcome them in the manuscripts submitted by new management researchers, such as doctoral students and junior faculty. The usual pitfalls in manuscripts submitted to business and management journals include poor writing and presentation, lack of integration, lack of significance, poor research design, and scanty description of methods, untidy presentation of results, and inadequate and sloppy discussion and implication sections. Borrowing from our experiences and the writings of the editors of top tier management journals, we offer guidelines for crafting clear and persuasive manuscripts. We provide suggestions for developing each section of the manuscript: topic choice, abstract, introduction, theory and grounding of hypotheses, research design, methods and results, discussion and implications, and references.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (120 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
khatri2017iimbcommonly
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Naresh Khatri;Arup Varma;Pawan Budhwar |
| Journal | no_j_found |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.iimb.2017.07.001
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.